Facebook's surveillance is nothing compared with CATV & Telcos: Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T, Centurylink and Verizon

Facebook's surveillance is nothing compared with CATV & Telcos: Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T, Centurylink and Verizon

Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T, Centurylink and Verizon pose a greater surveillance risk than Facebook – but their surveillance is much harder to avoid

Shadow of hand over computer keyboard

If you think Facebook’s “Cambridge Analytica problem” is bad, just wait until Comcast, Centurylink and Verizon are able to do the same thing.

In response to the Cambridge Analytica data privacy scandal, Facebook took out full-page apology ads in several prominent British and US newspapers. While the company acknowledged a “breach of trust”, it also pointed out that third-party developers like Cambridge Analytica no longer get access to as much information about users under Facebook’s current terms of service.

But contractual tweaking does little to change the privacy risks that techno-sociologist Zeynep Tufekci calls “an all too natural consequence of Facebook’s business model, which involves having people go to the site for social interaction, only to be quietly subjected to an enormous level of surveillance”.
Facebook admits it discussed sharing user data for medical research project
Read more

The thing is, Facebook isn’t the only company that amasses troves of data about people and leaves it vulnerable to exploitation and misuse. As of last year, Congress extended the same data-gathering practices of tech companies like Google and Facebook to internet providers like Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T, Centurylink and Verizon.

Because service providers serve as gatekeepers to the entire internet, they can collect far more information about us, and leave us with far less power to opt out of that process. This means that the risks of allowing our internet providers to collect and monetise the same type of user data that Facebook collects – and the potential that such data will therefore be misused – are much, much worse.

Your internet provider doesn’t just know what you do on Facebook – it sees all the sites you visit and how much time you spend there. Your provider can see where you shop, what you watch on TV, where you choose to eat dinner, what medical symptoms you search, where you apply for work, school, a mortgage. Everything that is unencrypted is fair game.

But internet providers don’t just pose a greater surveillance risk than Facebook –their surveillance is also far harder to avoid. “Choosing” not to use an internet provider to avoid surveillance is not really a choice at all. As of 2016, only about half of Americans have more than one option for broadband internet. In rural areas, this number drops to just 13%.

For these Americans, access to the internet means being subjected to whatever forms of surveillance their provider adopts. Even in places where users have more than one option, the decision to switch providers is much more costly and time-intensive than deleting an app. Many – though by no means all – of us are privileged enough to #DeleteFacebook, or at least reduce the time we spend there. But at a time when the internet is essential to completing schoolwork, finding and applying to jobs, running a business and maintaining community, very few of us are privileged enough to #DeleteTheInternet.

    Providers will be allowed to monitor customers’ behaviour and, without their permission, sell that data for targeted ads

Among the Obama administration’s last major policy reforms was implementing Federal Communications Commission rules limiting how internet providers use and sell customer data, and giving customers more control over how personal information like browsing habits, app usage history, location data and social security numbers may be used by service providers. These rules would have prevented ISPs from carelessly exposing data to third parties, as Facebook did with Cambridge Analytica.

Last March, Republicans and President Trump overturned these rules, allowing providers like Verizon and Comcast to monitor their customers’ behaviour online and, without their permission, sell that data for targeted ads. In other words, instead of restricting the dangerous and exploitative market of consumer data, Congress has expanded that market to include internet service providers.

Several states, including Massachusetts, have introduced legislation to reinstate – and in some cases, extend – the Obama-era privacy protections. And, unlike in the case of state efforts to restore net neutrality, privacy protections like Massachusetts’ senate bill 2062 are far more likely to withstand federal preemption challenges and provide enforceable state protections for internet users’ data.

The past few weeks have shown us that the stakes for establishing meaningful limits to corporate surveillance couldn’t be higher. By encouraging state lawmakers to step in to protect internet privacy and limit the use of our data by service providers, we can take a first step toward an internet where users aren’t forced to choose between data exploitation and the ability to live their digital lives.

   

Since you’re here …

… now is the time to support investigative reporting. My blog and an observer have spent a year analysing documents, working with whistleblowers and gathering eyewitness reports to untangle a complex story around data in the digital age. This took months of painstaking research by a small team of reporters and editors – and has led to investigations on both sides of the Atlantic. We have received legal threats, including from Facebook, but we are determined to continue publishing stories that raise important questions about the use of people’s data in political campaigns – from the US election to Brexit.

We increasingly need our readers to fund our fearless, independent, investigative reporting. Thank you to the many people who have already supported us financially – your contribution is what makes stories like this possible. Unlike many news organisations, we have not put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can.

For as little as $1, you can support my blog – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Support The blog: My Blog

Comments

    aren't you missing the point?

    ATT is an observer, Facebook is an active participant in undermining our political system
   

    It amazes me how people think it's only Facebook who shares your data. I would say " delete the internet and pay cash for everything " but even then there will always be public info on you for them to track including your voting record mah... Though we are all manipulated everyday by TV , Radio , News paper , Politicians etc... , Facebook remains the best socialnetwork able to provide us hear the news that come not said within the most of TV news . The problem is not that they browse content for advertising purposes ( they never showed an ad that I was interested in ) , but they store data in people indefinitely. Even if you delete your account , you entire history with them and how you use the internet in general remains available to them. Facebook and Google are tools for spy agencies. I believe that certain government agencies have backed access to all this data.

    Anyhow we are not naive not to know how our information will be used once these groups have when they taken our subscribsions in it. The Political cynism is something that the people usually don't know. There is an answer of that : the politicians have fear of the truth ! They are afraid to lose votes because Faceebook shows an ankward truth.

    The most Politicians believe that any kind of state control by Facebook has sinister implication to maintain the status quo against them and their hold over the thought policy ! In fact they're all agreed they are going to give it a modify ! However i have every confidence Facebook 'll be successfull again.

Can i say you this ? The modern society can not stay without Facebook !